Tuesday, March 3, 2009

what are our values, as teachers?

I am in the social action group.  I conducted research based on the idea of incorporating social justice into the curriculum.  One idea that came up over the course of my research was one's approach to "teaching values."  On the surface, this is a general idea, which can be defined in all kinds of ways.  I have frequently heard the idea that teachers should be apolitical.  We should be objective and value-neutral.  I think this is impossible.  And I am not alone.  At some point in most of the articles that I have read, each author mentioned that teaching is not an objective, value neutral activity. 
We are told to avoid "difficult" and "uncomfortable" topics like racism or oppression so as not to make our students uncomfortable or offend their parents.  But this is not value-neutral.  Whenever we make a discussion about what content to cover in class and what to leave out, we are making decisions that convey values.  As Kraft (one of the authors of my articles) explains, "choosing to avoid serious discussions about social issues is a value judgment that perpetuates injustice, racism, sexism, classism, and inequality."  We cannot remain silent on these issues unless we want to perpetuate these problems.
Furthermore, encouraging your students to take action and teaching them about examples of social activists who have effected change is no more biased than pretending that the world is fair and equal.  Doing nothing is not value-free or objective; it is irresponsible. Regardless of what we say or do, or don't say or don't do, we are role models.  I, for one, would like to be a role model that suggests that the world should and can be changed for the better.  I would like to be a role model that shows that fighting racism, sexism, classism, and homophobia are moral imperatives in our society.

3 comments:

  1. Thanks for your post Ms. Knees.
    I am a K-4 grade Special Education teacher and appreciate your position that remaining politically neutral is in fact political. It is far too easy for us teachers to stay within our comfort zones. In addition to all of the important factors you mention that teachers must consider when crafting curriculum I would add "developmentally appropriate." By this, I don't mean chronological age but challenging students to extend their thinking by one step. I think children should be challenged but a journey is step by step (this requires really knowing your students).
    Personally, during the election, I felt it most appropriate to wear a "vote" button until Obama won and then I revealed myself as a strong supporter of President Obama. I wonder what other teachers did?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I completely agree. So much of society currently teaches us to be neutral that we lose any 'flavor'. I believe the distinction is being open to all views, even those opposing.
    Then the beauty of expressing educated views, is that we open a dialogue and foster learning.
    So simple, yet so stifled today.
    A teachers views are not wrong as long as they are open to all views and allow them to be expressed.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that you can not be objective when you are a teacher, simply because of what you include and exclude in your lessons. Teachers may not be trying to make a politcal or social statement, but teaching is subjective based on the lessons one chooses. This is not a bad thing. I found the first reply interesting becasue I think it would be tough to teach younger/elementary aged students about such issues other than the "be nice to all people" approach commonly taught to children that age. I find no problem in introducing controversial topics to students, and controversial means different things to different people, as long as they are able to form their own (informed) opinion on the topic.

    ReplyDelete